Skip to main content

What if you build it and they don't come?

Apparently, the correct quote from Field of Dreams is 
If you build it, he will come.
I haven't seen the film. Nor do I completely understand the context. 

I work for a software company. We build software to make education better. Or at least that's the idea. I am back in school once more. It is a bit strange to be back in a classroom now. There are people there who are like 10 years younger than me. Its a bit weird listening to their conversations. Some things don't change. Video games are still the norm for the overweight young adult male. Except it is something called Call of Duty or some such thing.

The platform used by the school I am attending is a rival platform to the one my employer builds and sells. We lost this contract a while back. This gives me a good opportunity to get to know this competing system and learn from it. Except... I don't see much use of it in there. The guy teaching my class has the simplest of things for the course. He has like 6 links in his course page so far. All of them link to either a docx file or a pptx file. And that's it. Oh and he uses the mail in there. But he admits that it is very limited.

Which begs the following questions: 
  • Are we wasting our time building all these features?
  • Is he unaware of the potential of the platform?
  • Have I consumed too much of the corporate kool-aid and become a believer in technology for education to the point where common sense takes a departure... and I believe learning should involve use of e-learning platforms?

I don't know. I am not sure whether I was shocked at the simplicity of the course material or saddened by it. Hell, I can monkey this together in a few minutes on any site. A couple of <a href's> and some <li's> and what not and we're good. Is this why we spend hundreds of thousands of dollars, hours of testing, crap and what not for? So that the instructor can link to a few word documents and power point presentations? Is this why they are not our customer? I don't know.

Recently (well, last summer; time sure flies), I had a conversation with a former co-worker. He's an awesome guy, taught me a lot of things. He wrote a couple of things on a piece of paper that I still hold onto to this day. Anyway, he's now a high school teacher. He teaches sciences and chemistry to those that can tell the difference between science as a subject and chemistry as discipline. I asked him about how they use technology to teach kids. His answer was along  the same lines as the way I see my course material today. They use google sites. Or to be more precise, the kids used to mock up little sites on google sites and then link off to content and things. The teachers caught on fairly quick and decided to create pages for themselves. 
There isn't anything super-fancy there. No fancy question pools or agents that can do things. Just storing the content in some place that is accessible to the student and the teacher. Technology that works and does the job. Without the fluff. That's a pretty novel idea I think. 
I realise that this isn't how administrators or people in charge of education think (the various provosts and deans and what not at universities), but the more I think about it, the more I wonder what role we have in shaping education. These people don't see a need for it. Or at least, not enough to invest time in creating fancy course materials. Is it because it is too clunky to use? Too many clicks? Too much proprietary stuff that is not portable? 
What is the point of all the work I do if a professor who teaches technology chooses not to use the significant feature set that is available to him? The product is not one I work on, but the idea is the same. What good is a product we spend hours to build if no one out there is using it? Or maybe they are... and I am spending too much time thinking about stuff rather than sleeping. 
Oh well. Off to sleep. Thoughts? Well, say something then.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Summers are getting hotter in Vancouver

This shouldn't be a shock to anyone, but summers are getting a lot hotter here than it has been since I started living here. It used to be that in summer, it would be in low to mid 20s and reliably sunny between mid June to about mid August. Perhaps the sunshine stayed till September. Somewhere along the way, there would be rain as well. But that was 2+ decades ago.  In the past few years, there has been many days where wildfire smoke dominated the skies and air. Rain is rarity now in the summer. And it has started to get hot. It is not unusual for days when the highs are over 30C.  This is starting to cause homes to get very hot. Most apartment buildings in Vancouver are covered in glass. While it makes for great views, it also turns apartments into little ovens. My apartment faces West and it regularly goes over 30C by the end of the day. And it barely cools down overnight. The outside is a lot cooler in the evenings. A few years ago, we had something called a heat dome - ba...

How to make a good thing go bad quickly in tech

I haven't written a work related post in what seems like ages. I am currently living through the aftermath of a third M&A in my career. The company I currently work for is in its third incarnation - from a small tech startup 15 or so years ago to something that was sold to a large software company - one of those lumbering giants that have their hands in all kinds of technology driven fields - where they invested sufficiently in it to grow it in its current location - to now finally being acquired by an even larger technology company - one that its hands in all kinds of technology fields.I came along post the second phase but I have seen 2 other US tech company acquisitions, one that made me quit fast and the other that took me around the world but made me leave anyway. The difference from the previous take-over of the current place and this one is stark. While there was a lot of churn up top in the previous acquisition and differences in what you paid for benefits etc, for...

A few thoughts on the current state of Canada and US relationships

 It is easy to demonize the current US president for a myriad of reasons. Some have called him by the alleged tint of his skin (orange), some have called him a threat to democracy and used words like dictator, fascist etc. I am not going to delve into all that. He is, as far as I am concerned, the legitimate leader of a large country, duly elected by a majority of their voting population. What those people where thinking while voting for him in a majority, I question. But that is not the point of this post.  I live in Canada. I am a citizen of the country. I get to vote for an MP in my riding federally. The party who elects the most MPs is usually invited to form government by the head of state or (now) his representative. Our democratic norms are pretty simple and straightforward. There are plenty of things to criticize our electoral system for and the governments that come as a result. Anyway, all of this to say, we in Canada do not get to vote for a foreign leader. But we d...